New E&HB article format: Short Reports

The official HBES journal, Evolution and Human Behavior, has created a new report format: short reports. Short reports, created in honor of John Tooby, are intended to expedite the publication of concise reports of original research. Short reports contain no more than 3000 words in the introduction, methods, results and discussion combined, an abstract of 200 words or less, and a maximum of 30 references. The introduction, only a few paragraphs in length, should state concisely the evolutionary rationale for the project (for example, the relevant selection pressure/adaptive problem and proposed behavioral/cognitive solution), a very brief description of the methods used, and specific empirical predictions. Short reports may have online-only supplements that contain full materials, supplemental tables, and details of complex methods. However, the supplement may not be used to circumvent the word count. A reviewer/reader of EHB should be able to evaluate the science of a short report solely from the main paper. Members of the Editorial Review Board and Invited Reviewers of short reports will be notified of this new format to ensure appropriate appreciation of its concise nature. Details will appear soon on the EHB website.

Take part in a commentary article on John Tooby quotes

– by Deb Lieberman, Editor-in-Chief, Evolution & Human Behavior

In honor of John Tooby (1952-2023) and his contributions to our field, members of HBES and invited guests are welcome to pick a quote(s) from any Tooby publication of any year and take up to 350 words to state its importance or its impact on science. The 350-word runway is firm, no matter how many quotes you pull. You need not include a discussion of the quote if you do not wish; you can simply include your favorite quotes or passages. Whatever the case, your all-in word limit including any quotes is a firm 350 words. This is to allow as many HBES members to contribute as possible.

FAQ:

How many submissions per scholar?
One

How many authors per submission?
One. Single author submissions only.

Can the same quote be used by multiple contributors?
Yes. Of all the sentences written, we are hoping there is a wealth of options. However, we also know that people will have different interpretations and comments on similar quotes. The editorial team will organize submissions.

How many references are allowed?
The only references allowed will be for the quote(s) used.

What is the word limit?
350 words. All in. Firm.

How do I submit?
Complete the form using the Qualtrics link or QR code below: https://umiami.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bgA7sgv20cJsvmm

QR code for submissions

Will the submissions be reviewed?
Yes, by members of the Editorial Board. HBES membership will be verified. Submissions from non-HBES members (or individuals who have not been personally invited by the Editor) will be rejected. If you’d like to renew your HBES membership prior to submission, visit: https://www.hbes.com/membership-join/

Where can I find all of John Tooby’s publications?
Here is a link to the Center for Evolutionary Psychology Publication list, where you can find most of John’s publications. (https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/publication/)

When are submissions due?
Submissions are due by March 31st and notification of acceptance will be rolling. The link for submissions will be disabled after this date.

When will the tribute be published?
The editorial team will collect and compile the submissions, with the aim of publishing the collection as a single on-line article in the third or fourth issue of 2024. Details will be sent to contributors.

Deb Lieberman
Editor-in-Chief, EHB

ADAPT mentee application

Dates, deadlines, & info about HBES 2024 (Aarhus, Denmark)

We are fast approaching the 35th Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior & Evolution Society in Aarhus, Denmark! It will be held at Aarhus University from May 22-25, 2024. Here are some important dates to know about HBES 2024:

  • Abstract submission deadline: Feb 1st
  • Final abstract acceptance confirmations: March 1st
  • Last day for Early Registration: March 31st
  • Regular Registration begins: April 1st
  • Childcare registration deadline: April 15th
  • Regular Registration ends: May 21st
  • Late Registration begins: May 22nd
  • Conference dates: May 22-25

We have an exciting lineup of plenaries: Brian Nosek will give the keynote, and we will have plenaries by Dorsa Amir, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Nicolas Baumard, Judith Maria Burkart, Joseph Carroll, Jaimie Krems, and Manvir Singh.

Bookmark the conference website for updates and the most recent information.

Looking forward to seeing you in Aarhus!

Cultural transmission: Who learns what from whom? When, how, and why?

– by Eric Schniter, Michael Gurven, & Hillard Kaplan

Humans depend on culturally transmitted knowledge and skills crucial for their survival. But how is essential culture transmitted?

In economically modern human societies, most youngsters are formally educated alongside their similar-aged peers by unrelated teachers from an older generation. Adults in modern societies often develop into specialists, learning novel specialized skills from their coworkers and prestigious peers. But is this pattern of “horizontal” and “oblique” transmission from unrelated others the most fundamental mode of human culture transmission?

Evidence from subsistence groups like the Tsimane suggest that the patterns of cultural transmission, schooling, and skill development seen in economically modern society are not universal to all humans and were likely uncommon among our ancestors who relied on multi-generational broad social structures of kin-based exchange.

In our recent study in Evolution & Human Behavior, we brought a life history approach to the study of transmission vectors that considers how changes in embodied capital, combined with gender and relatedness, affect the costs and benefits to both the influencer and the learner. We emphasize the investments made in knowledge and skill across the human lifespan, and the returns on these investments at different ages that manifest in the array of competencies we see in a cross-section of society. We adapt the vector framework introduced by Luigi Cavalli-Sforza and Marcus Feldman to describe vertical, oblique, and horizontal cultural transmission relationships (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the intra- and inter-generational cultural transmission vectors, both related and unrelated that potentially influence receivers’ culture acquisition. Our cultural transmission study focuses on the relationships in bold fonts and colors.

So, what did we find? When do people learn, from whom, and how?

Our study focusing on 421 adult Tsimane forager-farmers native to Bolivia sheds light on how essential skills and specific domains of knowledge find their way from person to person and from one generation to the next. We examined the transmission vectors and styles of influence behind Tsimane people’s acquisition of 92 skills, ranging from those involving foraging, domestic chores, crafts and tool manufacture, childcare, music, and more. This transitioning community, living at the intersection of traditional foraging and farming practices and the rapidly changing demands of market integration, provides a unique lens to understand the vectors and influences driving cultural transmission.

We used a survey approach to gather knowledge about the skills that people had, their proficiency with those skills, and their reports of who influenced their skill acquisition by teaching, correction, helpful example, encouragement, or discouragement. Tsimane people report acquiring basic competency with most skills by the end of childhood and developing their skill proficiency further throughout adulthood.

Older, same-sex relatives predominantly influence Tsimane culture transmission, and in a variety of ways. They lead by example, directly instruct, correct learner’s mistakes, and sometimes just encourage and positively reinforce behaviors. Older adults are named most for these influences, despite the greater amount of time that kids spend interacting with same-generation peers while developing proficiency with most skills.

95% of culture transmission is reported as coming from within families (87% blood relatives, 8% related by marriage) and 75% from older kin. Vertical transmission from parents is most common, followed by oblique transmission from older kin. For example, grandparents –revered for their wisdom and experience—play a crucial role in imparting difficult-to-acquire skills that demand less physical strength but more complex knowledge, such as music performance, storytelling, and crafting. In contrast, peers of the same generation tend to positively influence the acquisition of modern, market-oriented skills, like finding wage labor opportunities and using machines for farming.

While similar-aged peers facilitate the acquisition of modern skills, they are reported to be the least helpful when it comes to positively influencing traditional skill acquisition. Unlike older kin, peers of the same generation are more likely to be competitors during the skill acquisition process, explaining why they are reported to be the mostly likely contributors of discouragement, a negative influence intended to inhibit skill acquisition.

We examined a diverse set of essential Tsimane skills and types of knowledge that has been conserved for untold generations, underscoring the important role of older adults and the multi-generational support of youngsters and young adults. This dominant pattern of kin-biased cultural transmission from older to younger generations mirrors the Tsimane pattern of kin-biased net food transfers between generations and within extended families (see here and here).

In subsistence societies, essential skills continue to develop for decades after they have been acquired (e.g., see here), forming older adults into “banks” of accumulated cultural solutions and practical knowledge (e.g., see here, and here). Our findings are consistent with the view that older-to-younger cultural transmission is the result of selection for a long lifespan favoring peak abilities for information retrieval and transmission to younger kin at late ages.

Generations of cultural isolation likely helped the Tsimane conserve their multigenerational system of cooperation and downward traditional culture transmission. However with rapid modernization, the current and future generations will face new challenges. Older adults’ contributions to their forager-farmer economy have been possible because of their comparative advantages and accumulated experience that comes with age. As transitioning societies increasingly value novel skillsets, and as younger generations develop comparatively greater proficiency and productivity with these modern skills, the opportunities for positive cultural influence and transfers from younger to older generations will grow. These results suggest that successful aging among adults, in both Tsimane and economically modern societies, will hinge on both upward inter-generational flows of knowledge and resources, and younger generations maintaining an appreciation for older adults’ roles as trusty helpers, educators, and experts of cultural traditions.

Read the original paper: Schniter, E., Kaplan, H. S., & Gurven, M. (2023). Cultural transmission vectors of essential knowledge and skills among Tsimane forager-farmers. Evolution and Human Behavior.